Why this work
QA that only covers the happy path is a delay, not a safety net. We write cases from the way people actually click, pay, fail and retry. Automation takes the paths that should never regress. People take the rest.
You get a report that names the risk, not a pass percentage that looks comforting. If a release is not ready, we will say that in the standup, not in an email after it went live.
Our offerings
What's included in our Functional QA service
-
01
Test design
Cases from real journeys, including the messy ones, mapped to risk so we do not test theatre.
-
02
Manual cycles
Exploratory and scripted passes on the build you are about to ship, with notes a developer can act on.
-
03
Automation suites
The paths that must not break, running in the pipeline so a red build is a conversation, not a surprise.
-
04
Release advice
A clear go or wait, with the defects that matter at the top. Not a spreadsheet of 200 equals.
Frequently asked questions
No. We catch what unit tests will not: journeys, data, devices, the payment that fails on retry.
No, and we will not pretend to. Stable paths get automated. New or chaotic ones stay with people until they settle.
Then the suite has to keep up, and the report has to be short. We design for that, not for a three week UAT window you do not have.
Talk to us about QA
If users are still finding the breaks, bring the last three incidents. We will tell you what a cycle should cover next.
Request a Consultation